[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13643577#comment-13643577
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-8450:
---------------------------------------
bq.Lastly, I notice that our tgz does not "include" an hbase-default.xml other
than the one bundled up in the jar. Maybe we should make it more accessible.
+1.
Also are we adding all the configs to xml when it is getting added to code? I
doubt this.. I have checked with 94 code base some time back and I was able to
find some of the configs only referred in code but not in hbase-default.xml
> Update hbase-default.xml and general recommendations to better suit current
> hw, h2, experience, etc.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-8450
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8450
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Usability
> Reporter: stack
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.95.1
>
> Attachments: 8450.txt
>
>
> This is a critical task we need to do before we release; review our defaults.
> On cursory review, there are configs in hbase-default.xml that no longer have
> matching code; there are some that should be changed because we know better
> now and others that should be amended because hardware and deploys are bigger
> than they used to be.
> We could also move stuff around so that the must-edit stuff is near the top
> (zk quorum config. is mid-way down the page) and beef up the descriptions --
> especially since these descriptions shine through in the refguide.
> Lastly, I notice that our tgz does not "include" an hbase-default.xml other
> than the one bundled up in the jar. Maybe we should make it more accessible.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
