[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13647856#comment-13647856
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8482:
----------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12581568/8482.txt
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 3 new
or modified tests.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
2.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5540//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5540//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5540//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5540//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5540//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5540//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5540//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5540//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5540//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5540//console
This message is automatically generated.
> TestHBaseFsck#testCheckTableLocks broke; java.lang.AssertionError:
> expected:<[]> but was:<[EXPIRED_TABLE_LOCK]>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-8482
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8482
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: stack
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.95.1
>
> Attachments: 8482.txt
>
>
> I've been looking into this test failure because I thought it particular to
> my rpc hackery.
> What I see is like the subject:
> {code}
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<[]> but was:<[EXPIRED_TABLE_LOCK]>
> {code}
> and later in same unit test:
> {code}
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<[EXPIRED_TABLE_LOCK]> but
> was:<[EXPIRED_TABLE_LOCK, EXPIRED_TABLE_LOCK]>
> {code}
> The test creates a write lock and then expires it. In subject failure, we
> are expiring the lock ahead of the time it should be. Easier for me to
> reproduce is that the second write lock we put in place is not allowed to
> happen because of the presence of the first lock EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN
> JUDGED EXPIRED:
> {code}
> ERROR: Table lock acquire attempt found:[tableName=foo,
> lockOwner=localhost,60000,1, threadId=387, purpose=testCheckTableLocks,
> isShared=false, createTime=129898749]
> 2013-05-02 00:34:42,715 INFO [Thread-183] lock.ZKInterProcessLockBase(431):
> Lock is held by: write-testing utility0000000000
> ERROR: Table lock acquire attempt found:[tableName=foo,
> lockOwner=localhost,60000,1, threadId=349, purpose=testCheckTableLocks,
> isShared=false, createTime=28506852]
> {code}
> Above, you see the expired lock and then our hbck lock visitor has it that
> the second lock is expired because it is held by the first lock.
> I can keep looking at this but input would be appreciated.
> It failed in recent trunk build
> https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-TRUNK/4090/testReport/junit/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util/TestHBaseFsck/testCheckTableLocks/
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
