[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13654870#comment-13654870
]
stack commented on HBASE-6929:
------------------------------
[~roshan_naik] Here is our attempt:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase/hbase-client/
What do you think? Will it work for you? We publish two artifacts, one
named w/ a hadoop1 suffix and the other with a hadoop2. Would be interested
in feedback. What I have so far is that this scheme will not work (our Elliott
has it our hadoop dependency is resolved before we have a chance to influence
it -- profiles).
> Publish Hbase 0.94 artifacts build against hadoop-2.0
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6929
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6929
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: build
> Affects Versions: 0.94.2
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Attachments: 6929.txt, hbase-6929_v2.patch
>
>
> Downstream projects (flume, hive, pig, etc) depends on hbase, but since the
> hbase binaries build with hadoop-2.0 are not pushed to maven, they cannot
> depend on them. AFAIK, hadoop 1 and 2 are not binary compatible, so we should
> also push hbase jars build with hadoop2.0 profile into maven, possibly with
> version string like 0.94.2-hadoop2.0.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
