[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13656511#comment-13656511
 ] 

Jean-Daniel Cryans commented on HBASE-8517:
-------------------------------------------

I'm having a bit of a hard time approaching this patch, not having the context 
and not being familiar with that part of the code. I can't really comment on 
the functionality so +1 if it fixes your issue and passes the tests, but here's 
a few nits:

 - The forceLog thing is misleading, since if you run at INFO it's still not 
logging. Maybe logTraceAtDebug would be better? Also add a comment in the code 
where you set it to true to say why you do it, it's not very obvious.
 - Like [[email protected]] said, the 600 is kind of coming out of nowhere 
but you gave me the reason and it makes sense why you can't just pass 
maxResults. Extract as a constant then?
 - The +9 for META's move cost should also be extracted as a constant, it would 
help with readability (not related to your patch, I know, you were just moving 
code).
                
> Stochastic Loadbalancer isn't finding steady state on real clusters
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8517
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8517
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.95.0
>            Reporter: Elliott Clark
>            Assignee: Elliott Clark
>         Attachments: HBASE-8517-0.patch, HBASE-8517-1.patch
>
>
> I have a cluster that runs IT tests.  Last night after all tests were done I 
> noticed that the balancer was thrashing regions around.
> The number of regions on each machine is not correct.
> The balancer seems to value the cost of moving a region way too little.
> {code}
> 2013-05-09 16:34:58,920 DEBUG [IPC Server handler 4 on 60000] 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer: Finished 
> computing new load balance plan.  Computation took 5367ms to try 8910 
> different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 37 regions; Going from a 
> computed cost of 56.50254222730425 to a new cost of 11.214035466575254
> 2013-05-09 16:37:48,715 DEBUG [IPC Server handler 7 on 60000] 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer: Finished 
> computing new load balance plan.  Computation took 4735ms to try 8910 
> different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 38 regions; Going from a 
> computed cost of 56.612624531830996 to a new cost of 11.275763861636982
> 2013-05-09 16:38:11,398 DEBUG [IPC Server handler 6 on 60000] 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer: Finished 
> computing new load balance plan.  Computation took 4502ms to try 8910 
> different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 39 regions; Going from a 
> computed cost of 56.50048461413552 to a new cost of 11.225352339003237
> {code}
> Each of those balancer runs were triggered when there was no load on the 
> cluster.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to