[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13665095#comment-13665095
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-4811:
----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12584478/HBase-4811-0.94-v2.txt
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 19 new
or modified tests.
{color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5796//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Support reverse Scan
> --------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-4811
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4811
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 0.20.6, 0.94.7
> Reporter: John Carrino
> Assignee: Liang Xie
> Attachments: HBase-4811-0.94.3modified.txt, HBase-4811-0.94-v2.txt
>
>
> All the documentation I find about HBase says that if you want forward and
> reverse scans you should just build 2 tables and one be ascending and one
> descending. Is there a fundamental reason that HBase only supports forward
> Scan? It seems like a lot of extra space overhead and coding overhead (to
> keep them in sync) to support 2 tables.
> I am assuming this has been discussed before, but I can't find the
> discussions anywhere about it or why it would be infeasible.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
