[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13670047#comment-13670047
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8653:
----------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12585358/HBASE-8653-v0.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
1.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
2.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5874//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5874//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5874//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5874//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5874//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5874//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5874//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5874//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5874//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5874//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> master seems to be deleting region tmp directory from under compaction
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8653
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8653
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
>            Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.95.1
>
>         Attachments: 8653-v2.txt, HBASE-8653-v0.patch
>
>
> Putting it in .1, feel free to move to .2.
> We have observed some compaction errors where the code was creating a new 
> HDFS block, and the file would not exist. Upon investigation, we found the 
> .tmp directory delete request on namenode from master IP shortly before that. 
> There are no specific logs on master, but one thing running at that time was 
> CatalogJanitor. CatalogJanitor calls 
> HRegionFileSystem::openRegionFromFileSystem with readOnly == true (in fact, 
> everyone does); if readOnly is true, HRegionFileSystem nukes the .tmp 
> directory.
> We didn't go thru details on how it arrived there (or if there may have been 
> other culprit), but it appears that deleting stuff if (readOnly) is not the 
> intended behavior and it should be if (!readOnly). Given that readOnly is not 
> really used (or rather is always true except some inconsequential usage in 
> test) perhaps entire cleanup should be removed.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to