[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13675532#comment-13675532
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8684:
----------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12586232/hbase-8684-trunk-v1.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 2 new
or modified tests.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
2.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5940//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5940//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5940//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5940//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5940//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5940//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5940//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5940//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5940//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5940//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Table Coprocessor can't access external HTable by default
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-8684
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8684
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Jesse Yates
> Assignee: Jesse Yates
> Fix For: 0.94.9
>
> Attachments: 8684-trunk.txt, hbase-8684-0.94-v0.patch,
> hbase-8684-0.94-v1.patch, hbase-8684-0.94-v2.patch, hbase-8684-trunk-v1.patch
>
>
> With the default configuration passed to a RegionCoprocessor environment, you
> cannot reach an HTable on the same cluster (at least in 0.94 - no verified
> yet in 0.96/8). The reason is in the usage of CompoundConfiguration
> (backported to 0.94 in HBASE-8176) when loading a table coprocessor we just
> do (RegionCoprocessorHost, ln 182):
> {code}
> Configuration newConf = new Configuration(conf);
> // set per-table cfspec properties
> {code}
> but the conf we pass in a CompoundConfiguration, which means the copy
> constructor from Configuration doesn't work at all.
> So, we really need two things:
> 1. A test that we can reach another HTable in the same cluster via a
> coprocessor by default
> 2. Fixing the configuration creation in RegionCoprocessorHost to support (1)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
