[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13685820#comment-13685820
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-8755:
------------------------------

[~fenghh] Your approach looks good.  Thanks for working on this.  I like the 
numbers you are getting for throughput.  Any idea of its effect on general 
latencies?  Does HLogPerformanceEvaluation help evaluating this approach?  Did 
you deploy this code to production?

Can I still (if only optionally) sync every write as it comes in? (For the 
paranoid).

In general, remove rather than comment stuff out:

{code}
-    assertTrue("Should have an outstanding WAL edit", 
log.hasDeferredEntries());
+    //assertTrue("Should have an outstanding WAL edit", 
log.hasDeferredEntries());
{code}

Regards the above, the test is no longer valid given the indirection around 
sync/flush?

To be clear, when we call doWrite, we just append the log edit to a linked 
list?  (We call it a bufferLock but we just doing append to the linked list?)

Patch is looking good.  Thanks [~fenghh]



How does deferred log flush still work when you remove stuff like 
optionalFlushInterval?  You say '...don't pend on HLog.syncer() waiting for its 
txid to be sync-ed' but that is another behavior than what we had here 
previously.

If first thread throws IE, then other threads will still be running (in below):

{code}
+    try {
+      asyncNotifier.interrupt();
+      asyncNotifier.join();
+
+      asyncFlusher.interrupt();
+      asyncFlusher.join();
+
+      asyncWriter.interrupt();
+      asyncWriter.join();
+    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
+      LOG.error("Exception while waiting for syncer thread to die", e);
     }
{code}

Thread names usually follow a pattern where the prefix is the name of the host 
(RS:SHORT_SERVERNAME-AsyncWriter).. we can fix around commit.

This new thread does not implement HasThread:

+  private class AsyncNotifier extends Thread {









                
> A new write thread model for HLog to improve the overall HBase write 
> throughput
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8755
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8755
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: wal
>            Reporter: Feng Honghua
>         Attachments: HBASE-8755-0.94-V0.patch
>
>
> In current write model, each write handler thread (executing put()) will 
> individually go through a full 'append (hlog local buffer) => HLog writer 
> append (write to hdfs) => HLog writer sync (sync hdfs)' cycle for each write, 
> which incurs heavy race condition on updateLock and flushLock.
> The only optimization where checking if current syncTillHere > txid in 
> expectation for other thread help write/sync its own txid to hdfs and 
> omitting the write/sync actually help much less than expectation.
> Three of my colleagues(Ye Hangjun / Wu Zesheng / Zhang Peng) at Xiaomi 
> proposed a new write thread model for writing hdfs sequence file and the 
> prototype implementation shows a 4X improvement for throughput (from 17000 to 
> 70000+). 
> I apply this new write thread model in HLog and the performance test in our 
> test cluster shows about 3X throughput improvement (from 12150 to 31520 for 1 
> RS, from 22000 to 70000 for 5 RS), the 1 RS write throughput (1K row-size) 
> even beats the one of BigTable (Precolator published in 2011 says Bigtable's 
> write throughput then is 31002). I can provide the detailed performance test 
> results if anyone is interested.
> The change for new write thread model is as below:
>  1> All put handler threads append the edits to HLog's local pending buffer; 
> (it notifies AsyncWriter thread that there is new edits in local buffer)
>  2> All put handler threads wait in HLog.syncer() function for underlying 
> threads to finish the sync that contains its txid;
>  3> An single AsyncWriter thread is responsible for retrieve all the buffered 
> edits in HLog's local pending buffer and write to the hdfs 
> (hlog.writer.append); (it notifies AsyncFlusher thread that there is new 
> writes to hdfs that needs a sync)
>  4> An single AsyncFlusher thread is responsible for issuing a sync to hdfs 
> to persist the writes by AsyncWriter; (it notifies the AsyncNotifier thread 
> that sync watermark increases)
>  5> An single AsyncNotifier thread is responsible for notifying all pending 
> put handler threads which are waiting in the HLog.syncer() function
>  6> No LogSyncer thread any more (since there is always 
> AsyncWriter/AsyncFlusher threads do the same job it does)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to