[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-18575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16352769#comment-16352769
]
Eugene Koifman commented on HIVE-18575:
---------------------------------------
I left some comments on RB. Mostly, I think the change in
TableScanDesc() doesn't do the right thing.
Also, the test for full acid is sometimes called isAcidTable() and sometimes
isFullAcidTable() - either is fine but I think it's confusing to have both.
> ACID properties usage in jobconf is ambiguous for MM tables
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-18575
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-18575
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Transactions
> Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
> Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HIVE-18575.patch
>
>
> Vectorization checks for ACID table trigger for MM tables where they don't
> apply. Other places seem to set the setting for transactional case while most
> of the code seems to assume it implies full acid.
> Overall, many places in the code use the settings directly or set the ACID
> flag without setting the ACID properties.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
