[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-18750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sankar Hariappan updated HIVE-18750:
------------------------------------
Description:
Per table write id implementation (HIVE-18192) have introduced write ID per
table and used write ID to name the delta/base files and also as primary key
for each row.
Now, exchange partition have to move delta/base files across tables without
changing the write ID which causes incorrect results.
Also, this exchange partition feature is there to support the use-case of
atomic updates. But with ACID updates, we shall support atomic-updates and
hence it makes sense to not support exchange partition for ACID and MM tables.
The qtest file mm_exchangepartition.q test results to be updated after this
change.
was:
Per table write id implementation (HIVE-18192) have introduced write ID per
table and used write ID to name the delta/base files and also as primary key
for each row.
Now, exchange partition have to move delta/base files across tables without
changing the write ID which causes incorrect results.
Also, this exchange partition feature is there to support the use-case of
atomic updates. But with ACID updates, we shall support atomic-updates and
hence it makes sense to not support exchange partition for ACID and MM tables.
> Exchange partition should not be supported with per table write ID.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-18750
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-18750
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: HiveServer2, Transactions
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Sankar Hariappan
> Assignee: Sankar Hariappan
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ACID, DDL
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> Per table write id implementation (HIVE-18192) have introduced write ID per
> table and used write ID to name the delta/base files and also as primary key
> for each row.
> Now, exchange partition have to move delta/base files across tables without
> changing the write ID which causes incorrect results.
> Also, this exchange partition feature is there to support the use-case of
> atomic updates. But with ACID updates, we shall support atomic-updates and
> hence it makes sense to not support exchange partition for ACID and MM tables.
> The qtest file mm_exchangepartition.q test results to be updated after this
> change.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)