[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aihua Xu updated HIVE-10984:
----------------------------
Summary: "Lock table" explicit lock command doesn't lock the database
object. (was: When ZooKeeperHiveLockManager locks an object exclusively, it
doesn't check the lock on the children.)
> "Lock table" explicit lock command doesn't lock the database object.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-10984
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-10984
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Locking
> Reporter: Aihua Xu
> Assignee: Aihua Xu
>
> There is an issue in ZooKeeperHiveLockManager.java, in which when locking
> exclusively on an object we didn't check if the children are locked.
> So the following should not be allowed.
> {noformat}
> use default;
> lock table lockneg2.tstsrcpart shared;
> lock database lockneg2 exclusive;
> {noformat}
> Also check the test case lockneg_try_lock_db_in_use.q to add more reasonable
> failure cases.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
