[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16504405#comment-16504405
]
Hive QA commented on HIVE-19708:
--------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 8s{color}
| {color:red}
/data/hiveptest/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-11582/patches/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-11582.patch
does not apply to master. Rebase required? Wrong Branch? See
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/HowToContribute for help.
{color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Console output |
http://104.198.109.242/logs//PreCommit-HIVE-Build-11582/yetus.txt |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Repl copy retrying with cm path even if the failure is due to network issue
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-19708
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19708
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Hive, HiveServer2, repl
> Affects Versions: 3.1.0
> Reporter: mahesh kumar behera
> Assignee: mahesh kumar behera
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 4.0.0
>
> Attachments: HIVE-19708.01.patch, HIVE-19708.02.patch,
> HIVE-19708.04.patch, HIVE-19708.05.patch, HIVE-19708.06-branch-3.patch,
> HIVE-19708.06.patch, HIVE-19708.07-branch-3.patch
>
>
> * During repl load
> ** for filesystem based copying of file if the copy fails due to a
> connection error to source Name Node, we should recreate the filesystem
> object.
> ** the retry logic for local file copy should be triggered using the
> original source file path ( and not the CM root path ) since failure can be
> due to network issues between DFSClient and NN.
> * When listing files in tables / partition to include them in _files, we
> should add retry logic when failure occurs. FileSystem object here also
> should be recreated since the existing one might be in inconsistent state.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)