[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16540665#comment-16540665
]
Alexander Kolbasov commented on HIVE-19902:
-------------------------------------------
[~owen.omalley] Thank you for the example - I didn't know about Level.Trial
annotations. I'll experiment with JMH more using this approach. I still have
other concerns with JMH since it doesn't give me full control over the results
dataset. One feature that I am using a lot is saving raw data in files and
looking at gnuplot graphs.
[~alangates] [~pvary] [~vihangk1] [~owen.omalley] I still think that the
current approach (not using JMH) has its benefits - it is very simple and
doesn't have any licensing issues. What do you think about going ahead with the
current proposed implementation and then later possibly adding separate
JMH-based submodule which isn't compiled by default?
> Provide Metastore micro-benchmarks
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-19902
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19902
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Standalone Metastore
> Affects Versions: 3.1.0, 4.0.0
> Reporter: Alexander Kolbasov
> Assignee: Alexander Kolbasov
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HIVE-19902.01.patch, HIVE-19902.02.patch,
> HIVE-19902.03.patch, HIVE-19902.04.patch
>
>
> It would be very useful to have metastore benchmarks to be able to track perf
> issues.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)