[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-11258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14645278#comment-14645278
]
Hive QA commented on HIVE-11258:
--------------------------------
{color:green}Overall{color}: +1 all checks pass
Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12747601/HIVE-11258.patch
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} +1 9274 tests passed
Test results:
http://ec2-174-129-184-35.compute-1.amazonaws.com/jenkins/job/PreCommit-HIVE-TRUNK-Build/4738/testReport
Console output:
http://ec2-174-129-184-35.compute-1.amazonaws.com/jenkins/job/PreCommit-HIVE-TRUNK-Build/4738/console
Test logs:
http://ec2-174-129-184-35.compute-1.amazonaws.com/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-TRUNK-Build-4738/
Messages:
{noformat}
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.PrepPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.ExecutionPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.ReportingPhase
{noformat}
This message is automatically generated.
ATTACHMENT ID: 12747601 - PreCommit-HIVE-TRUNK-Build
> The function drop_database_core() of HiveMetaStore.java may not drop all the
> tables
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-11258
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-11258
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Database/Schema
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Aihua Xu
> Assignee: Aihua Xu
> Attachments: HIVE-11258.patch
>
>
> The following code in that function doesn't work properly.
> {noformat}
> int startIndex = 0;
> int endIndex = -1;
> // retrieve the tables from the metastore in batches to alleviate
> memory constraints
> while (endIndex < allTables.size() - 1) {
> startIndex = endIndex + 1;
> endIndex = endIndex + tableBatchSize;
> if (endIndex >= allTables.size()) {
> endIndex = allTables.size() - 1;
> }
> {noformat}
> e.g.: if we have 5 tables and tableBatchSize is 10, startIndex will be 0 and
> endIndex will be 4. We only drop 4 tables since sublist(startIndex, endIndex)
> is inclusive on startIndex and exclusive on endIndex.
> If total tables is larger tableBatchSize, we also have similar issues.
> This is discovered when I work on HIVE-11255.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
