[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-21392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16793533#comment-16793533
 ] 

Hive QA commented on HIVE-21392:
--------------------------------



Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12962563/HIVE-21392.03.patch

{color:red}ERROR:{color} -1 due to build exiting with an error

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/16524/testReport
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/16524/console
Test logs: http://104.198.109.242/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-16524/

Messages:
{noformat}
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.TestCheckPhase
Tests exited with: Exception: Patch URL 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12962563/HIVE-21392.03.patch 
was found in seen patch url's cache and a test was probably run already on it. 
Aborting...
{noformat}

This message is automatically generated.

ATTACHMENT ID: 12962563 - PreCommit-HIVE-Build

> Misconfigurations of DataNucleus log in log4j.properties
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-21392
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-21392
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Logging
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Chen Zhi
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: HIVE-21392.02.patch, HIVE-21392.03.patch, 
> HIVE-21392.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In the patch of  
> [HIVE-12020|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-12020], we changed the 
> DataNucleus related logging configuration from nine fine-grained loggers with 
> three coarse-grained loggers (DataNucleus, Datastore and JPOX). As Prasanth 
> Jayachandran 
> [explain|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-12020?focusedCommentId=15025612&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15025612],
>  these three loggers are the top-level logger in DataNucleus, so that we 
> don't need to specify other loggers for DataNucleus. However, according to 
> the 
> [documents|http://www.datanucleus.org/products/accessplatform/logging.html] 
> and [source 
> codes|https://github.com/datanucleus/datanucleus-core/blob/master/src/main/java/org/datanucleus/util/NucleusLogger.java#L108]
>  of DataNucleus, the top-level logger in DataNucleus is `DataNucleus`. 
> Therefore, we just need to keep the right one.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to