[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-21465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16795201#comment-16795201
 ] 

Laszlo Bodor edited comment on HIVE-21465 at 3/18/19 4:51 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

uploaded an initial version into review board
https://reviews.apache.org/r/70231/

this introduces generic BaseVectorExpression, which can ensure correct input / 
output columnvector types at compile time

beforeLoop is an example for an optionally extendable method (which should be 
optimized by JIT in case it's a noop I guess)


was (Author: abstractdog):
uploaded an initial version into review board
https://reviews.apache.org/r/70231/

this introduces generic BaseVectorExpression, which can ensure correct input / 
output columnvector types at compile time

> Introduce a base abstract VectorExpression to eliminate further code 
> duplications
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-21465
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-21465
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Laszlo Bodor
>            Assignee: Laszlo Bodor
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HIVE-21465.01.patch
>
>
> In vectorized expressions, from time to time, I see a similar/same logic to 
> be repeated, which always consists of some stuff like:
> 1. some inner loops (even the comments are the same)
> {code}
> grep -iRH "Set isNull before call in case it changes it mind" | grep 
> "ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/vector/expressions/"
> {code}
> 2. call to an actual "business logic" function ==> 1 line which could be 
> abstracted... and it has been abstracted in hive codebase in n different 
> cases.
> However, an abstract BaseVectorExpression would not force anybody to extend 
> it instead of VectorExpression and not copy the code again, but it could be a 
> good start and an example.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to