[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-21713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16884425#comment-16884425
]
Manoj Narayanan commented on HIVE-21713:
----------------------------------------
Ok. I think we should
* Have Operator or Task at the end based on the type.
* Operator/Task Class name where words are separated by space. (That's how
currently most of Operators are named)
* No changes if already above rule is met. (for e.g.:Merge Join Operator)
> Explain consistency Task/Operator
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-21713
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-21713
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Zoltan Haindrich
> Assignee: Manoj Narayanan
> Priority: Major
>
> there seems to be some inconsistency what gets printed in the explain;
> for example "MoveTask" is shown as "Move Operator" in the explain
> Becase Tasks and Operators are basically different things - this should be
> corrected as it may cause confusion
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
