[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-22375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16955969#comment-16955969
 ] 

Hive QA commented on HIVE-22375:
--------------------------------



Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12983587/HIVE-22375.1.patch

{color:red}ERROR:{color} -1 due to no test(s) being added or modified.

{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} +1 due to 17545 tests passed

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/19085/testReport
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/19085/console
Test logs: http://104.198.109.242/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-19085/

Messages:
{noformat}
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.TestCheckPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.PrepPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.YetusPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.ExecutionPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.ReportingPhase
{noformat}

This message is automatically generated.

ATTACHMENT ID: 12983587 - PreCommit-HIVE-Build

> ObjectStore.lockNotificationSequenceForUpdate is leaking query in case of 
> error
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-22375
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-22375
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Standalone Metastore
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0
>            Reporter: Marta Kuczora
>            Assignee: Marta Kuczora
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HIVE-22375.1.patch
>
>
> In the ObjectStore.lockNotificationSequenceForUpdate method, the query 
> doesn't get closed if an error occur:
> {noformat}
>   private void lockNotificationSequenceForUpdate() throws MetaException {
>     if (sqlGenerator.getDbProduct() == DatabaseProduct.DERBY && directSql != 
> null) {
>       // Derby doesn't allow FOR UPDATE to lock the row being selected (See 
> https://db.apache
>       // .org/derby/docs/10.1/ref/rrefsqlj31783.html) . So lock the whole 
> table. Since there's
>       // only one row in the table, this shouldn't cause any performance 
> degradation.
>       new RetryingExecutor(conf, () -> {
>         directSql.lockDbTable("NOTIFICATION_SEQUENCE");
>       }).run();
>     } else {
>       String selectQuery = "select \"NEXT_EVENT_ID\" from 
> \"NOTIFICATION_SEQUENCE\"";
>       String lockingQuery = sqlGenerator.addForUpdateClause(selectQuery);
>       new RetryingExecutor(conf, () -> {
>         prepareQuotes();
>         Query query = pm.newQuery("javax.jdo.query.SQL", lockingQuery);
>         query.setUnique(true);
>         // only need to execute it to get db Lock
>         query.execute();
>         query.closeAll();
>       }).run();
>     }
>   }
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to