[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-22414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16962505#comment-16962505
]
Hive QA commented on HIVE-22414:
--------------------------------
Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12984242/HIVE-22414.1.patch
{color:red}ERROR:{color} -1 due to build exiting with an error
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/19198/testReport
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/19198/console
Test logs: http://104.198.109.242/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-19198/
Messages:
{noformat}
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.TestCheckPhase
Tests exited with: Exception: Patch URL
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12984242/HIVE-22414.1.patch
was found in seen patch url's cache and a test was probably run already on it.
Aborting...
{noformat}
This message is automatically generated.
ATTACHMENT ID: 12984242 - PreCommit-HIVE-Build
> Make LLAP CacheTags more memory efficient
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-22414
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-22414
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: llap
> Reporter: Ádám Szita
> Assignee: Ádám Szita
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HIVE-22414.0.patch, HIVE-22414.1.patch
>
>
> MultiPartitionCacheTag relies on LinkedLists.
> A LinkedList object that holds e.g. 2 nodes consumes 112 bytes roughly in
> this composition:
> * 16 bytes for LinkedList object header
> * 8 bytes for referring head
> * 8 bytes for referring tail
> * 80 = 2 x (16 bytes for LinkedList$Node header, 3 x 8 bytes for referring
> prev, next, item)
> This is a lot, so I propose to replace LinkedList in MultiPartitionCacheTag
> with a simple String array. (For a similar scenario an array would take 16 +
> 8 + 2 x 8 = 40 bytes, as per header, count, and 2 references for our actual
> objects).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
