[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-23763?focusedWorklogId=465619&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-465619
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on HIVE-23763:
-----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 03/Aug/20 09:56
Start Date: 03/Aug/20 09:56
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: kuczoram commented on a change in pull request #1327:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/1327#discussion_r464313931
##########
File path:
itests/hive-unit/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/txn/compactor/CompactorOnTezTest.java
##########
@@ -95,6 +98,10 @@ private void setupTez(HiveConf conf) {
conf.set("hive.tez.container.size", "128");
conf.setBoolean("hive.merge.tezfiles", false);
conf.setBoolean("hive.in.tez.test", true);
+ if (!mmCompaction) {
+ conf.set("tez.grouping.max-size", "1024");
Review comment:
Sure, added a comment.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 465619)
Time Spent: 1h 20m (was: 1h 10m)
> Query based minor compaction produces wrong files when rows with different
> buckets Ids are processed by the same FileSinkOperator
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-23763
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-23763
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Transactions
> Affects Versions: 4.0.0
> Reporter: Marta Kuczora
> Assignee: Marta Kuczora
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 4.0.0
>
> Time Spent: 1h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> How to reproduce:
> - Create an unbucketed ACID table
> - Insert a bigger amount of data into this table so there would be multiple
> bucket files in the table
> The files in the table should look like this:
> /warehouse/tablespace/managed/hive/bubu_acid/delta_0000001_0000001_0000/bucket_00000_0
> /warehouse/tablespace/managed/hive/bubu_acid/delta_0000001_0000001_0000/bucket_00001_0
> /warehouse/tablespace/managed/hive/bubu_acid/delta_0000001_0000001_0000/bucket_00002_0
> /warehouse/tablespace/managed/hive/bubu_acid/delta_0000001_0000001_0000/bucket_00003_0
> /warehouse/tablespace/managed/hive/bubu_acid/delta_0000001_0000001_0000/bucket_00004_0
> /warehouse/tablespace/managed/hive/bubu_acid/delta_0000001_0000001_0000/bucket_00005_0
> - Do some delete on rows with different bucket Ids
> The files in a delete delta should look like this:
> /warehouse/tablespace/managed/hive/bubu_acid/delete_delta_0000002_0000002_0000/bucket_00000
> /warehouse/tablespace/managed/hive/bubu_acid/delete_delta_0000006_0000006_0000/bucket_00003
> /warehouse/tablespace/managed/hive/bubu_acid/delete_delta_0000006_0000006_0000/bucket_00001
> - Run the query-based minor compaction
> - After the compaction the newly created delete delta containes only 1 bucket
> file. This file contains rows from all buckets and the table becomes unusable
> /warehouse/tablespace/managed/hive/bubu_acid/delete_delta_0000001_0000007_v0000066/bucket_00000
> The issue happens only if rows with different bucket Ids are processed by the
> same FileSinkOperator.
> In the FileSinkOperator.process method, the files for the compaction table
> are created like this:
> {noformat}
> if (!bDynParts && !filesCreated) {
> if (lbDirName != null) {
> if (valToPaths.get(lbDirName) == null) {
> createNewPaths(null, lbDirName);
> }
> } else {
> if (conf.isCompactionTable()) {
> int bucketProperty = getBucketProperty(row);
> bucketId =
> BucketCodec.determineVersion(bucketProperty).decodeWriterId(bucketProperty);
> }
> createBucketFiles(fsp);
> }
> }
> {noformat}
> When the first row is processed, the file is created and then the
> filesCreated variable is set to true. Then when the other rows are processed,
> the first if statement will be false, so no new file gets created, but the
> row will be written into the file created for the first row.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
