[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-24234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17212779#comment-17212779
 ] 

Rajesh Balamohan commented on HIVE-24234:
-----------------------------------------

Thanks [~ashutoshc], [~mustafaiman]. Merged the PR to master.

> Improve checkHashModeEfficiency in VectorGroupByOperator
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-24234
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-24234
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Rajesh Balamohan
>            Assignee: Rajesh Balamohan
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: HIVE-24234.wip.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently, {{VectorGroupByOperator::checkHashModeEfficiency}} compares the 
> number of entries with the number input records that have been processed. For 
> grouping sets, it accounts for grouping set length as well.
> Issue is that, the condition becomes invalid after processing large number of 
> input records. This prevents the system from switching over to streaming 
> mode. 
> e.g Assume 500,000 input records processed, with 9 grouping sets, with 
> 100,000 entries in hashtable. Hashtable would never cross 4,500,0000 entries 
> as the max size itself is 1M by default. 
> It would be good to compare the input records (adjusted for grouping sets) 
> with number of output records (along with size of hashtable size) to 
> determine hashing or streaming mode.
> E.g Q67.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to