[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-25509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

László Bodor updated HIVE-25509:
--------------------------------
    Description: I think, if we want the close operation to be safe and 
idempotent, we should not fail on client side if 2 different close requests 
come in (due to socket timeout + retry) for the same operation handle (and 
second fails because operation handle was already removed for the first request 
which then socket timed out)

> CLIService.closeOperation should not fail if operation handle is not present
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-25509
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-25509
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: László Bodor
>            Assignee: László Bodor
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I think, if we want the close operation to be safe and idempotent, we should 
> not fail on client side if 2 different close requests come in (due to socket 
> timeout + retry) for the same operation handle (and second fails because 
> operation handle was already removed for the first request which then socket 
> timed out)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to