[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-25509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
László Bodor updated HIVE-25509:
--------------------------------
Description: I think, if we want the close operation to be safe and
idempotent, we should not fail on client side if 2 different close requests
come in (due to socket timeout + retry) for the same operation handle (and
second fails because operation handle was already removed for the first request
which then socket timed out)
> CLIService.closeOperation should not fail if operation handle is not present
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-25509
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-25509
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: László Bodor
> Assignee: László Bodor
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I think, if we want the close operation to be safe and idempotent, we should
> not fail on client side if 2 different close requests come in (due to socket
> timeout + retry) for the same operation handle (and second fails because
> operation handle was already removed for the first request which then socket
> timed out)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)