[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-11611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17424867#comment-17424867
]
katty he commented on HIVE-11611:
---------------------------------
So, now the performance has been fixed? because I am upgrading parquet to
1.11.1, but when I count(1) or count(*), the query performance is still slow,
however when I count(column), the performance is improved greatly, so I am
confused, am I still change to code to improve performace? thx.
> A bad performance regression issue with Parquet happens if Hive does not
> select any columns
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-11611
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-11611
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Sergio Peña
> Assignee: Ferdinand Xu
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HIVE-11611.patch
>
>
> A possible performance issue may happen with the below code when using a
> query like this {{SELECT count(1) FROM parquetTable}}.
> {code}
> if (!ColumnProjectionUtils.isReadAllColumns(configuration) &&
> !indexColumnsWanted.isEmpty()) {
> MessageType requestedSchemaByUser =
> getSchemaByIndex(tableSchema, columnNamesList,
> indexColumnsWanted);
> return new ReadContext(requestedSchemaByUser, contextMetadata);
> } else {
> return new ReadContext(tableSchema, contextMetadata);
> }
> {code}
> If there are not columns nor indexes selected, then the above code will read
> the full schema from Parquet even if Hive does not do anything with such
> values.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
