[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-12644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15053937#comment-15053937
 ] 

Laljo John Pullokkaran commented on HIVE-12644:
-----------------------------------------------

In HiveSortMergeRule @92 isn't it better to check if offset+limit is less than 
the one from below.
i.e 
if ((topOffset + topLimit) < (bottomOffset + bottomLimit))

> Support for offset in HiveSortMergeRule
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-12644
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-12644
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: CBO
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.0
>            Reporter: Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>            Assignee: Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>         Attachments: HIVE-12644.patch
>
>
> After HIVE-11531 goes in, HiveSortMergeRule needs to be extended to support 
> offset properly when it merges operators that contain Limit. Otherwise, limit 
> pushdown through outer join optimization (introduced in HIVE-11684) will not 
> work properly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to