[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15183595#comment-15183595
]
Alan Gates commented on HIVE-13213:
-----------------------------------
Well, not necessarily. As it stands now non-ACID readers get read committed
consistency. So you're arguing that both acid and non-acid tables should have
the same consistency model. I need to think about that. It's not obvious to
me whether that should be true or not.
> make DbLockManger work for non-acid resources
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-13213
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13213
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Transactions
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Eugene Koifman
> Assignee: Eugene Koifman
> Attachments: HIVE-13213.patch
>
>
> for example,
> insert into T values(...)
> if T is an ACID table we acquire Read lock
> but for non-acid table it should acquire Exclusive lock
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)