[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15342416#comment-15342416
 ] 

Sergio Peña commented on HIVE-13884:
------------------------------------

Thanks [~sershe].

[~mohitsabharwal] [~brocknoland] I run a test with 10K partitions {{select * 
from table12 where dt < 10000}} with the variable enabled and disabled. There's 
not too much difference. I got a difference of 1 second, and I tested it 5 
times each time, even without the patch applied. I think we are good to go for 
this.

I'll wait until HIVE-14055 is fixed as I would need to change this patch as 
well.

> Disallow queries fetching more than a configured number of partitions in 
> PartitionPruner
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-13884
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13884
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Mohit Sabharwal
>            Assignee: Sergio Peña
>         Attachments: HIVE-13884.1.patch, HIVE-13884.2.patch, 
> HIVE-13884.3.patch, HIVE-13884.4.patch, HIVE-13884.5.patch, HIVE-13884.6.patch
>
>
> Currently the PartitionPruner requests either all partitions or partitions 
> based on filter expression. In either scenarios, if the number of partitions 
> accessed is large there can be significant memory pressure at the HMS server 
> end.
> We already have a config {{hive.limit.query.max.table.partition}} that 
> enforces limits on number of partitions that may be scanned per operator. But 
> this check happens after the PartitionPruner has already fetched all 
> partitions.
> We should add an option at PartitionPruner level to disallow queries that 
> attempt to access number of partitions beyond a configurable limit.
> Note that {{hive.mapred.mode=strict}} disallow queries without a partition 
> filter in PartitionPruner, but this check accepts any query with a pruning 
> condition, even if partitions fetched are large. In multi-tenant 
> environments, admins could use more control w.r.t. number of partitions 
> allowed based on HMS memory capacity.
> One option is to have PartitionPruner first fetch the partition names 
> (instead of partition specs) and throw an exception if number of partitions 
> exceeds the configured value. Otherwise, fetch the partition specs.
> Looks like the existing {{listPartitionNames}} call could be used if extended 
> to take partition filter expressions like {{getPartitionsByExpr}} call does.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to