[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-14169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15364841#comment-15364841
 ] 

Sahil Takiar commented on HIVE-14169:
-------------------------------------

Hey! It shouldn't affect HIVE-14135

According to 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-7224?focusedCommentId=15363688&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15363688
 the width calculation is only used when Beeline prints its output using a 
{{TableOutputFormat}}. It seems there are multiple formats the Beeline can 
print its output, including CSV, TSV, etc. 
({{org.apache.hive.beeline.OutputFormat}} is the interface to control this).

The goal for this JIRA is to just skip the width calculation if 
{{TableOutputFormat}} is not used.

> Beeline Row printing should only calculate the width if TableOutputFormat is 
> used
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-14169
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-14169
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Beeline
>            Reporter: Sahil Takiar
>            Assignee: Sahil Takiar
>
> * When Beeline prints out a {{ResultSet}} to stdout it uses the 
> {{BeeLine.print}} method
> * This method takes the {{ResultSet}} from the completed query and uses a 
> specified {{OutputFormat}} to print the rows (by default it uses 
> {{TableOutputFormat}})
> * The {{print}} method also wraps the {{ResultSet}} into a {{Rows}} class 
> (either a {{IncrementalRows}} or a {{BufferedRows}} class)
> * The {{Rows}} class will calculate the optimal width that each row in the 
> {{ResultSet}} should be displayed with
> * However, this width is only relevant / used by {{TableOutputFormat}}
> We should modify the logic so that the width is only calculated if 
> {{TableOutputFormat}} is used. This will save CPU cycles when printing 
> records out to the user.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to