[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-14374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15400101#comment-15400101
 ] 

Peter Vary commented on HIVE-14374:
-----------------------------------

[~stakiar] Currently only a handful of parameters are documented as a command 
line option, but almost twice as many could be set from the configuration file. 
I don't know how much of it is by design, and how much of this is by error. I 
hope someone with more experience in Hive could help here.

+1 for the commons-cli solution and then we could forget every annotation 
magic. I wasn't brave enough to suggest it, although it is already used in 
beeline compatibility mode.

> BeeLine argument, and configuration handling cleanup
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-14374
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-14374
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Beeline
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Peter Vary
>            Assignee: Peter Vary
>
> BeeLine uses reflection, to set the BeeLineOpts attributes when parsing 
> command line arguments, and when loading the configuration file.
> This means, that creating a setXXX, getXXX method in BeeLineOpts is a 
> potential risk of exposing an attribute for the user unintentionally. There 
> is a possibility to exclude an attribute from saving the value in the 
> configuration file with the Ignore annotation. This does not restrict the 
> loading or command line setting of these parameters which means there are 
> many undocumented "features" as-is, like setting the lastConnectedUrl, 
> allowMultilineCommand, maxHeight, trimScripts, etc. from command line.
> This part of the code needs a little cleanup.
> I think we should make this exposure more explicit, and be able to 
> differentiate the configurable options depending on the source (command line, 
> and configuration file), so I propose to create a mechanism to tell 
> explicitly which BeeLineOpts attributes are settable by command line, and 
> configuration file, and every other attribute should be inaccessible by the 
> user of the beeline cli.
> One possible solution could be two annotations like these:
> - CommandLineOption - there could be a mandatory text parameter here, so the 
> developer had to provide the help text for it which could be displayed to the 
> user
> - ConfigurationFileOption - no text is required here
> Something like this:
> - This attribute could be provided by command line, and from a configuration 
> file too:
> {noformat}
> @CommandLineOption("automatically save preferences")
> @ConfigurationFileOption
> public void setAutosave(boolean autosave) {
>   this.autosave = autosave;
> }
> public void getAutosave() {
>   return this.autosave;
> }
> {noformat}
> - This attribute could be set through the configuration only
> {noformat}
> @ConfigurationFileOption
> public void setLastConnectedUrl(String lastConnectedUrl) {
>   this.lastConnectedUrl = lastConnectedUrl;

> }
> 

> public String getLastConnectedUrl()
> {

>   return lastConnectedUrl;
> 
}
> 
{noformat}
> - Attribute could be set through command line only - I think this is not too 
> relevant, but possible
> {noformat}
> @CommandLineOption("specific command line option")
> public void setSpecificCommandLineOption(String specificCommandLineOption) {
> 
  this.specificCommandLineOption = specificCommandLineOption;
> 
}
> 

> public String getSpecificCommandLineOption() {
> 
  return specificCommandLineOption;
> 
}
> 
{noformat}
> - Attribute could not be set
> {noformat}
> public static Env getEnv() {
> 
  return env;
> 
}
> 

public static void setEnv(Env envToUse) {
> 
  env = envToUse;
> 
}
> {noformat}
> Accouring to our previous conversations, I think you might be interested in: 
> [~spena], [~vihangk1], [~aihuaxu], [~ngangam], [~ychena], [~xuefuz]
> but anyone is welcome to discuss this.
> What do you think about the proposed solution?
> Any better ideas, or extensions?
> Thanks,
> Peter



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to