[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Prasanth Jayachandran updated HIVE-16180:
-----------------------------------------
    Attachment: HIVE-16180.1.patch

> LLAP: Native memory leak in EncodedReader
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-16180
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16180
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: llap
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Prasanth Jayachandran
>            Assignee: Prasanth Jayachandran
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HIVE-16180.1.patch
>
>
> Observed this in internal test run. There is a native memory leak in Orc 
> EncodedReaderImpl that can cause YARN pmem monitor to kill the container 
> running the daemon. Direct byte buffers are null'ed out which is not 
> guaranteed to be cleaned until next Full GC. To show this take issue, 
> attaching a small test program that allocations 3x256MB direct byte buffers. 
> First buffer is null'ed out but still native memory is used. Second buffer 
> user Cleaner to clean up native allocation. Third buffer is also null'ed but 
> this time invoking a System.gc() which cleans up all native memory. Output 
> from the test program is below
> {code}
> Allocating 3x256MB direct memory..
> Native memory used: 786432000
> Native memory used after data1=null: 786432000
> Native memory used after data2.clean(): 524288000
> Native memory used after data3=null: 524288000
> Native memory used without gc: 524288000
> Native memory used after gc: 0
> {code}
> Longer term improvements/solutions:
> 1) Use DirectBufferPool from hadoop or netty's 
> https://netty.io/4.0/api/io/netty/buffer/PooledByteBufAllocator.html as 
> direct byte buffer allocations are expensive (System.gc() + 100ms thread 
> sleep).
> 2) Use HADOOP-12760 for proper cleaner invocation in JDK8 and JDK9



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to