[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Misha Dmitriev updated HIVE-16079:
----------------------------------
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> HS2: high memory pressure due to duplicate Properties objects
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-16079
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16079
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: HiveServer2
> Reporter: Misha Dmitriev
> Assignee: Misha Dmitriev
> Attachments: HIVE-16079.01.patch, HIVE-16079.02.patch,
> hs2-crash-2000p-500m-50q.txt
>
>
> I've created a Hive table with 2000 partitions, each backed by two files,
> with one row in each file. When I execute some number of concurrent queries
> against this table, e.g. as follows
> {code}
> for i in `seq 1 50`; do beeline -u jdbc:hive2://localhost:10000 -n admin -p
> admin -e "select count(i_f_1) from misha_table;" & done
> {code}
> it results in a big memory spike. With 20 queries I caused an OOM in a HS2
> server with -Xmx200m and with 50 queries - in the one with -Xmx500m.
> I am attaching the results of jxray (www.jxray.com) analysis of a heap dump
> that was generated in the 50queries/500m heap scenario. It suggests that
> there are several opportunities to reduce memory pressure with not very
> invasive changes to the code. One (duplicate strings) has been addressed in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15882 In this ticket, I am going
> to address the fact that almost 20% of memory is used by instances of
> java.util.Properties. These objects are highly duplicate, since for each
> partition each concurrently running query creates its own copy of Partion,
> PartitionDesc and Properties. Thus we have nearly 100,000 (50 queries * 2,000
> partitions) Properties in memory. By interning/deduplicating these objects we
> may be able to save perhaps 15% of memory.
> Note, however, that if there are queries that mutate partitions, the
> corresponding Properties would be mutated as well. Thus we cannot simply use
> a single "canonicalized" Properties object at all times for all Partition
> objects representing the same DB partition. Instead, I am going to introduce
> a special CopyOnFirstWriteProperties class. Such an object initially
> internally references a canonicalized Properties object, and keeps doing so
> while only read methods are called. However, once any mutating method is
> called, the given CopyOnFirstWriteProperties copies the data into its own
> table from the canonicalized table, and uses it ever after.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
