[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15987688#comment-15987688
 ] 

Gopal V commented on HIVE-16523:
--------------------------------

bq. is it a good idea to store hash ctx in every wrapper?

That was an assumption - the current object has a 4 byte slack.

{code}
     44     4   org.apache.hadoop.hive.common.type.HiveIntervalDayTime[] 
VectorHashKeyWrapper.intervalDayTimeValues   null
     48     4                                                  boolean[] 
VectorHashKeyWrapper.isNull                  null
     52     4                                                            (loss 
due to the next object alignment)
{code}


> VectorHashKeyWrapper hash code for strings is not so good
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-16523
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16523
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
>            Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
>         Attachments: HIVE-16523.01.patch, HIVE-16523.02.patch, 
> HIVE-16523.patch
>
>
> Perf issues in vectorized gby on some string keys



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to