[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16017546#comment-16017546
]
Zoltan Haindrich commented on HIVE-13583:
-----------------------------------------
[~leftylev] I've added it to:
* Operators and UDFs – Operators Precedences
* Operators and UDFs – Relational Operators
Although the new operators has udf implementations; I don't really see the need
to add them to the 'Conditional Functions' section - because I consider these
functions as "internal"...and I can't really think of any situation where it
would aid the user....
what's your opinion in this matter, should I add them for completeness?
note:..seems like psql also advertises some of its 'nonstandard constructs' :)
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/functions-comparison.html
> E061-14: Search Conditions
> --------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-13583
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-13583
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Carter Shanklin
> Assignee: Zoltan Haindrich
> Labels: TODOC3.0
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HIVE-13583.1.patch, HIVE-13583.2.patch
>
>
> This is a part of the SQL:2011 Analytics Complete Umbrella JIRA HIVE-13554.
> Support for various forms of search conditions are mandatory in the SQL
> standard. For example, "<predicate> is not true;" Hive should support those
> forms mandated by the standard.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
