[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16125313#comment-16125313
 ] 

Hive QA commented on HIVE-17308:
--------------------------------



Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12881685/HIVE-17308.4.patch

{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} +1 due to 1 test(s) being added or modified.

{color:red}ERROR:{color} -1 due to 15 failed/errored test(s), 11004 tests 
executed
*Failed tests:*
{noformat}
org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.TestBlobstoreCliDriver.testCliDriver[insert_overwrite_dynamic_partitions_merge_move]
 (batchId=243)
org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.TestBlobstoreCliDriver.testCliDriver[insert_overwrite_dynamic_partitions_merge_only]
 (batchId=243)
org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.TestBlobstoreCliDriver.testCliDriver[insert_overwrite_dynamic_partitions_move_only]
 (batchId=243)
org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.TestCliDriver.testCliDriver[join_alt_syntax] 
(batchId=75)
org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.TestCliDriver.testCliDriver[join_cond_pushdown_2] 
(batchId=57)
org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.TestCliDriver.testCliDriver[join_cond_pushdown_4] 
(batchId=79)
org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.TestMiniSparkOnYarnCliDriver.testCliDriver[spark_dynamic_partition_pruning]
 (batchId=169)
org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.TestMiniSparkOnYarnCliDriver.testCliDriver[spark_dynamic_partition_pruning_mapjoin_only]
 (batchId=170)
org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.TestMiniSparkOnYarnCliDriver.testCliDriver[spark_vectorized_dynamic_partition_pruning]
 (batchId=169)
org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.TestMiniTezCliDriver.testCliDriver[explainuser_3] 
(batchId=99)
org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.TestPerfCliDriver.testCliDriver[query14] 
(batchId=235)
org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.TestPerfCliDriver.testCliDriver[query23] 
(batchId=235)
org.apache.hive.hcatalog.api.TestHCatClient.testPartitionRegistrationWithCustomSchema
 (batchId=180)
org.apache.hive.hcatalog.api.TestHCatClient.testPartitionSpecRegistrationWithCustomSchema
 (batchId=180)
org.apache.hive.hcatalog.api.TestHCatClient.testTableSchemaPropagation 
(batchId=180)
{noformat}

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/6380/testReport
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/6380/console
Test logs: http://104.198.109.242/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-6380/

Messages:
{noformat}
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.TestCheckPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.PrepPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.ExecutionPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.ReportingPhase
Tests exited with: TestsFailedException: 15 tests failed
{noformat}

This message is automatically generated.

ATTACHMENT ID: 12881685 - PreCommit-HIVE-Build

> Improvement in join cardinality estimation
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-17308
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17308
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Query Planning
>            Reporter: Vineet Garg
>            Assignee: Vineet Garg
>         Attachments: HIVE-17308.1.patch, HIVE-17308.2.patch, 
> HIVE-17308.3.patch, HIVE-17308.4.patch
>
>
> Currently during logical planning join cardinality is estimated assuming no 
> correlation among join keys (This estimation is done using exponential 
> backoff). Physical planning on the other hand consider correlation for multi 
> keys and uses different estimation. We should consider correlation during 
> logical planning as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to