[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16296028#comment-16296028
 ] 

Sahil Takiar commented on HIVE-17684:
-------------------------------------

Thanks for taking this on [~mi...@cloudera.com]. Looks like Hive QA is failing 
due to:

{code}
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project hive-shims-common: Could not resolve 
dependencies for project 
org.apache.hive.shims:hive-shims-common:jar:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT: The following 
artifacts could not be resolved: org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-common:jar:3.0.0, 
org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-auth:jar:3.0.0, 
org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-hdfs-client:jar:3.0.0, 
org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-yarn-api:jar:3.0.0, 
org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-yarn-client:jar:3.0.0, 
org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-mapreduce-client-core:jar:3.0.0, 
org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-yarn-common:jar:3.0.0, 
org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-annotations:jar:3.0.0: Could not find artifact 
org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-common:jar:3.0.0 in datanucleus
{code}

Maybe the Hadoop 3.0.0 artifacts haven't propagated to datanucleus yet. Can you 
build your patch locally?

> HoS memory issues with MapJoinMemoryExhaustionHandler
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-17684
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17684
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Spark
>            Reporter: Sahil Takiar
>            Assignee: Misha Dmitriev
>         Attachments: HIVE-17684.01.patch
>
>
> We have seen a number of memory issues due the {{HashSinkOperator}} use of 
> the {{MapJoinMemoryExhaustionHandler}}. This handler is meant to detect 
> scenarios where the small table is taking too much space in memory, in which 
> case a {{MapJoinMemoryExhaustionError}} is thrown.
> The configs to control this logic are:
> {{hive.mapjoin.localtask.max.memory.usage}} (default 0.90)
> {{hive.mapjoin.followby.gby.localtask.max.memory.usage}} (default 0.55)
> The handler works by using the {{MemoryMXBean}} and uses the following logic 
> to estimate how much memory the {{HashMap}} is consuming: 
> {{MemoryMXBean#getHeapMemoryUsage().getUsed() / 
> MemoryMXBean#getHeapMemoryUsage().getMax()}}
> The issue is that {{MemoryMXBean#getHeapMemoryUsage().getUsed()}} can be 
> inaccurate. The value returned by this method returns all reachable and 
> unreachable memory on the heap, so there may be a bunch of garbage data, and 
> the JVM just hasn't taken the time to reclaim it all. This can lead to 
> intermittent failures of this check even though a simple GC would have 
> reclaimed enough space for the process to continue working.
> We should re-think the usage of {{MapJoinMemoryExhaustionHandler}} for HoS. 
> In Hive-on-MR this probably made sense to use because every Hive task was run 
> in a dedicated container, so a Hive Task could assume it created most of the 
> data on the heap. However, in Hive-on-Spark there can be multiple Hive Tasks 
> running in a single executor, each doing different things.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to