tzengjames-TW commented on issue #7654: URL: https://github.com/apache/hop/issues/7654#issuecomment-5125344660
Thank you for the clarification. I agree that wrapping the Pipeline in a Child Workflow solves the problem. My intention is not to make Repeat ignore failures or behave differently from other Pipeline actions. The point I wanted to raise is that a Pipeline executed directly by Repeat has no workflow-level error handling boundary. Once the Pipeline fails, the Repeat action fails immediately and the workflow stops. By contrast, a Child Workflow allows the failure to be handled before deciding the final outcome. I understand there is already a workaround. I simply wanted to highlight the difference in error-handling capabilities between executing a Pipeline directly and executing it through a Child Workflow. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
