Kryst4lDem0ni4s commented on issue #183:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph-ai/issues/183#issuecomment-2691981937

   @imbajin , I agree with @Aryankb's understanding but as for the workflow 
priority, here are my two cents:
   
      ```
    A[User Query] --> B(Agno L1 Processor)
       B -->|Simple Lookup| C[HugeGraph Cache]
       B -->|Complex Query| D{CrewAI Orchestrator}
       D -->|Multi-Hop| E[LlamaIndex Retriever]
       D -->|Computation| F[HugeGraph-Computer]
       E --> F[Result Aggregator]
       F --> G[Pydantic Validator]
       G --> H[Output Formatter]
   ```
   
   Here, we'll be considering the top four candidate frameworks (CrewAI, Agno, 
LlamaIndex, Pydantic-AI) against HugeGraph's requirements for implementing an 
agentic GraphRAG system.
   
   Instead of taking one out of the bunch, I'll reiterate my suggestion for the 
hybrid approach.
   
   Deploy Agno for L1 queries
   Implement CrewAI's dynamic classifier with HugeGraph embeddings
   Develop hybrid caching layer (RocksDB + Agno shared memory)
   Build Pydantic validation middleware
   Introduce LlamaIndex recursive retrieval
   
   CrewAI's Performance Profile (I asked chatgpt for an analysis)
   ```
   Throughput: 8,500 QPS (L2 queries)
   Memory: 1.8GB per orchestration node
   Latency: 45ms P99 for complex workflows
   Key Advantages
   Native integration with HugeGraph's RocksDB-based embeddings
   Prebuilt Prometheus metrics exporter for OLAP/OLTP monitoring
   
   ```
   So summing it up here is the proposed architecture, kept simple:
   
   > Base Layer (Agno)
   > Handle high-frequency L1 queries through optimized parallel execution
   > Implement Gremlin-Cypher transpiler for hybrid query support
   > Orchestration Layer (CrewAI)
   > Manage complex workflows using dynamic intent classification
   > Integrate with HugeGraph's priority queue system
   > Validation Layer (Pydantic-AI)
   > Enforce schema consistency across all graph operations
   > Provide developer-friendly type hints
   > Retrieval Enhancement (LlamaIndex)
   > Implement recursive retrieval with tiered caching
   > Integrate with HugeGraph's OLAP engine
   
   
   My rationale and research summarized:
   Agno delivers performance gains for core operations while maintaining  lower 
memory usage
   CrewAI's workflow engine reduces development time for complex agent 
interactions compared to manual implementations
   Hybrid model achieves a much higher fault recovery through layered fallback 
mechanisms
   
   This proposed architecture is based off of what I saw on the apache's jira, 
where the required architecture was provided for the upcoming months of 
development.
   
   I also emailed you additional insights for the architecture, please do check 
( @imbajin )


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to