imbajin commented on code in PR #358:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hugegraph-ai/pull/358#discussion_r3346746060


##########
hugegraph-llm/src/hugegraph_llm/api/rag_api.py:
##########
@@ -45,103 +66,110 @@ def rag_http_api(
     apply_reranker_conf,
     gremlin_generate_selective_func,
 ):
-    @router.post("/rag", status_code=status.HTTP_200_OK)
-    def rag_answer_api(req: RAGRequest):
-        set_graph_config(req)
-
-        # Basic parameter validation: empty query => 400
-        if not req.query or not str(req.query).strip():
-            raise HTTPException(
-                status_code=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST,
-                detail="Query must not be empty.",
-            )
-
-        result = rag_answer_func(
-            text=req.query,
-            raw_answer=req.raw_answer,
-            vector_only_answer=req.vector_only,
-            graph_only_answer=req.graph_only,
-            graph_vector_answer=req.graph_vector_answer,
-            graph_ratio=req.graph_ratio,
-            rerank_method=req.rerank_method,
-            near_neighbor_first=req.near_neighbor_first,
-            gremlin_tmpl_num=req.gremlin_tmpl_num,
-            max_graph_items=req.max_graph_items,
-            topk_return_results=req.topk_return_results,
-            vector_dis_threshold=req.vector_dis_threshold,
-            topk_per_keyword=req.topk_per_keyword,
-            # Keep prompt params in the end
-            custom_related_information=req.custom_priority_info,
-            answer_prompt=req.answer_prompt or prompt.answer_prompt,
-            keywords_extract_prompt=req.keywords_extract_prompt or 
prompt.keywords_extract_prompt,
-            gremlin_prompt=req.gremlin_prompt or 
prompt.gremlin_generate_prompt,
-        )
-        # TODO: we need more info in the response for users to understand the 
query logic
-        return {
-            "query": req.query,
-            **{
-                key: value
-                for key, value in zip(
-                    ["raw_answer", "vector_only", "graph_only", 
"graph_vector_answer"],
-                    result,
-                )
-                if getattr(req, key)
-            },
-        }
-
-    def set_graph_config(req):
-        if req.client_config:
-            huge_settings.graph_url = req.client_config.url
-            huge_settings.graph_name = req.client_config.graph
-            huge_settings.graph_user = req.client_config.user
-            huge_settings.graph_pwd = req.client_config.pwd
-            huge_settings.graph_space = req.client_config.gs
-
-    @router.post("/rag/graph", status_code=status.HTTP_200_OK)
-    def graph_rag_recall_api(req: GraphRAGRequest):
+    @contextmanager
+    def request_graph_config(req):
+        # TODO: pass graph config through request-scoped flow/operator context
+        # instead of temporarily mutating process-global huge_settings.
+        original_values = _snapshot_settings(huge_settings, 
_GRAPH_CONFIG_FIELD_MAP.values())

Review Comment:
   Agreed that this is still not true request isolation, but I would avoid 
fixing it with a global lock in this PR. The guarded section includes 
long-running RAG/Text2Gremlin work, so a lock would serialize concurrent 
requests and hurt throughput/latency. For this PR, let's make the FIXME 
explicit and track the real fix as a follow-up refactor: pass graph config 
through request-scoped flow/operator context and construct per-request 
HugeGraph clients instead of mutating huge_settings.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to