danielcweeks commented on PR #8065: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8065#issuecomment-1671631966
Overall, I'm not opposed to adding a bom, but I'm not sure if this will be more helpful or confusing. Many projects that depend on iceberg (Flink/Spark/etc.) do not publish a bom and Iceberg will frequently be dropped in. If you build fat job jars, they may pull in transitive dependencies that conflict with the existing libraries. We try to match -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
