rdblue commented on code in PR #9008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9008#discussion_r1421811936


##########
api/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/expressions/Literals.java:
##########
@@ -501,18 +531,22 @@ public <T> Literal<T> to(Type type) {
           return (Literal<T>) new TimeLiteral(timeMicros);
 
         case TIMESTAMP:
-          if (((Types.TimestampType) type).shouldAdjustToUTC()) {
-            long timestampMicros =
-                ChronoUnit.MICROS.between(
-                    EPOCH, OffsetDateTime.parse(value(), 
DateTimeFormatter.ISO_DATE_TIME));
-            return (Literal<T>) new TimestampLiteral(timestampMicros);
+          TimestampType tsType = (TimestampType) type;
+          if (tsType.shouldAdjustToUTC()) {
+            long timestampUnits =
+                tsType
+                    .unit()
+                    .between(EPOCH, OffsetDateTime.parse(value(), 
DateTimeFormatter.ISO_DATE_TIME));

Review Comment:
   Should this logic move into `DateTimeUtil` now that there are two versions? 
I think we've avoided that up until now to to avoid modifying this code, but if 
it is changing anyway we could at least standardize.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to