nk1506 commented on PR #9852:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9852#issuecomment-2189554813

   Thanks a lot @szehon-ho . 
   
   
   > hi, @nk1506 thanks for ping, ill look at this, but just FYI, when I look a 
few times back this patch seems a bit far, it adds things like 
ViewAwareTableBuilder and TableAwareViewBuilder that dont make much sense, and 
it will take some time to think if there is a better way.
   
   Since other catalogs have followed the same strategy, I kept those changes 
out of this PR's scope. 
   > 
   > Also, because of the earlier review feedback from @nastra it seems we 
abandoned the effort to unify metadata class to re-use code from 
HiveTableOperations that I and @pvary initially proposed . If this is the 
direction we chose, its ok , but it will take personally some time for me to 
double check everything, as we are re-implementing all the commit code.
   
   As refactoring with common code for table and view this PR became very big. 
and it was being difficult to review. We definitely want to bring the common 
part together. I think we should do it with another patch. 
   > 
   > Another reviewer may also look at the patch of course, I am just sharing 
my experience reviewing this one.
   
   @nastra has reviewed throughly on the HiveCatalog and related parts. He 
proposed to get feedback on the Hive core parts from experts.  
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to