singhpk234 commented on code in PR #11180: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11180#discussion_r1795908515
########## core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/rest/RESTContentFileParser.java: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,250 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the + * specific language governing permissions and limitations + * under the License. + */ +package org.apache.iceberg.rest; + +import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonGenerator; +import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonNode; +import java.io.IOException; +import java.nio.ByteBuffer; +import java.util.List; +import java.util.Map; +import org.apache.iceberg.ContentFile; +import org.apache.iceberg.DataFile; +import org.apache.iceberg.FileContent; +import org.apache.iceberg.FileFormat; +import org.apache.iceberg.GenericDataFile; +import org.apache.iceberg.GenericDeleteFile; +import org.apache.iceberg.Metrics; +import org.apache.iceberg.PartitionData; +import org.apache.iceberg.SingleValueParser; +import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.base.Preconditions; +import org.apache.iceberg.util.JsonUtil; + +public class RESTContentFileParser { + private static final String SPEC_ID = "spec-id"; + private static final String CONTENT = "content"; + private static final String FILE_PATH = "file-path"; + private static final String FILE_FORMAT = "file-format"; + private static final String PARTITION = "partition"; + private static final String RECORD_COUNT = "record-count"; + private static final String FILE_SIZE_IN_BYTES = "file-size-in-bytes"; + private static final String COLUMN_SIZES = "column-sizes"; + private static final String VALUE_COUNTS = "value-counts"; + private static final String NULL_VALUE_COUNTS = "null-value-counts"; + private static final String NAN_VALUE_COUNTS = "nan-value-counts"; + private static final String LOWER_BOUNDS = "lower-bounds"; + private static final String UPPER_BOUNDS = "upper-bounds"; + private static final String KEY_METADATA = "key-metadata"; + private static final String SPLIT_OFFSETS = "split-offsets"; + private static final String EQUALITY_IDS = "equality-ids"; + private static final String SORT_ORDER_ID = "sort-order-id"; + + private RESTContentFileParser() {} + + public static String toJson(ContentFile<?> contentFile) { + return JsonUtil.generate( + generator -> RESTContentFileParser.toJson(contentFile, generator), false); + } + + public static void toJson(ContentFile<?> contentFile, JsonGenerator generator) + throws IOException { + Preconditions.checkArgument(contentFile != null, "Invalid content file: null"); + Preconditions.checkArgument(generator != null, "Invalid JSON generator: null"); + + generator.writeStartObject(); + + generator.writeNumberField(SPEC_ID, contentFile.specId()); + generator.writeStringField(CONTENT, contentFile.content().name()); + generator.writeStringField(FILE_PATH, contentFile.path().toString()); + generator.writeStringField(FILE_FORMAT, contentFile.format().name()); + + generator.writeFieldName(PARTITION); + + // TODO at the time of serialization we dont have the partition spec we just have spec id. + // we will need to get the spec from table metadata using spec id. + // or we will need to send parition spec, put null here for now until refresh + SingleValueParser.toJson(null, contentFile.partition(), generator); + + generator.writeNumberField(FILE_SIZE_IN_BYTES, contentFile.fileSizeInBytes()); + + metricsToJson(contentFile, generator); + + if (contentFile.keyMetadata() != null) { + generator.writeFieldName(KEY_METADATA); + SingleValueParser.toJson(DataFile.KEY_METADATA.type(), contentFile.keyMetadata(), generator); + } + + if (contentFile.splitOffsets() != null) { + JsonUtil.writeLongArray(SPLIT_OFFSETS, contentFile.splitOffsets(), generator); + } + + if (contentFile.equalityFieldIds() != null) { + JsonUtil.writeIntegerArray(EQUALITY_IDS, contentFile.equalityFieldIds(), generator); + } + + if (contentFile.sortOrderId() != null) { + generator.writeNumberField(SORT_ORDER_ID, contentFile.sortOrderId()); + } + + generator.writeEndObject(); + } + + public static ContentFile<?> fromJson(JsonNode jsonNode) { + Preconditions.checkArgument(jsonNode != null, "Invalid JSON node for content file: null"); + Preconditions.checkArgument( + jsonNode.isObject(), "Invalid JSON node for content file: non-object (%s)", jsonNode); + + int specId = JsonUtil.getInt(SPEC_ID, jsonNode); + FileContent fileContent = FileContent.valueOf(JsonUtil.getString(CONTENT, jsonNode)); + String filePath = JsonUtil.getString(FILE_PATH, jsonNode); + FileFormat fileFormat = FileFormat.fromString(JsonUtil.getString(FILE_FORMAT, jsonNode)); + + // TODO at the time of deserialization we dont have the partition spec we just have spec id. + // we will need to get the spec from table metadata using spec id. + // we wil need to send parition spec i believe, put some placeholder here for now null Review Comment: > we send back the full serialized partition spec .In case we were worried about payload sizes going over the wire we could follow the same concept we do for delete file references where there's a top level list where it's only listed once, and in the tasks itself it's just an integer index. But this complicates the protocol. presently this leaves us with no option but to bind the partition spec with the current schema of the snapshot being queried, which is tbh not a bad option as schema / partition evolution cases takes care of not allowing backward incompatible schema by default. interesting would be cases when we allow this flag in schema evolution ? Having schema_id would be beneficial tbh as if for now we want to project col a, col b and the data file not having any of them would still be returned to the client which eventually the engines / caller will discard but this makes me think more in terms of column level access control, but totally understand we lack this mechanism today. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
