simonykq commented on issue #10710:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10710#issuecomment-2451893935
@pvary
Thanks for the info. Very informative.
I am more of less thinking of letting flink runtime treat it as a Pojo types
using `PojoTypeInfo`. Something like this:
@TypeInfo(WriteResult.WriteResultTypeInfoFactory.class)
```
public class WriteResult {
private DataFile[] dataFiles;
private DeleteFile[] deleteFiles;
private CharSequence[] referencedDataFiles;
public static class WriteResultTypeInfoFactory extends
TypeInfoFactory<WriteResult> {
@Override
public TypeInformation<WriteResult> createTypeInfo(Type t,
Map<String, TypeInformation<?>> genericParameters) {
return Types.POJO(WriteResult.class, Map.of(
"dataFiles",
Types.OBJECT_ARRAY(TypeInformation.of(BaseFile.class)),
"deleteFiles",
Types.OBJECT_ARRAY(TypeInformation.of(BaseFile.class)),
"referencedDataFiles",
Types.OBJECT_ARRAY(Types.STRING)));
}
}
}
```
And then maybe doing something similiar for `BaseFile.class`. Is that
feasible?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
