zeroshade commented on PR #435: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/pull/435#issuecomment-2894898872
@Fokko @kevinjqliu @rdblue Should we update the documentation to explicitly point this out? It looks like iceberg-java is the only one that breaks on this. pyiceberg (and of course iceberg-go) have no issue reading the resulting Avro, it's only Java that *requires* the field to be named "r508", meaning we can't rely on the field-ids for the Avro reading and must ensure the record names match the way java constructs them, even though it's not documented anywhere in the spec. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
