RussellSpitzer commented on issue #14043: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/14043#issuecomment-3282427555
1. I .... am not sure here. Theoretically I don't think there should be a problem with doing this. 2. Parquet files written by Iceberg libraries *do include field ids* and these are used when reading. Iceberg starts with field ids, then if they are missing uses the default name mapping, and if that is missing uses positional mapping. See the Spec for notes on column projection 3. Possibly 4. Not sure, it sounds like there are real bugs here? In general though I recommend against using Map types in columnar data types since they can't be efficiently used for pruning. Now that we have Variants I think those are generally a better approach but ymmv -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org