aihuaxu commented on code in PR #14081:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14081#discussion_r2349896296


##########
parquet/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/parquet/ParquetMetricsRowGroupFilter.java:
##########
@@ -157,8 +157,10 @@ public <T> Boolean notNull(BoundReference<T> ref) {
 
       // When filtering nested types notNull() is implicit filter passed even 
though complex
       // filters aren't pushed down in Parquet. Leave all nested column type 
filters to be
-      // evaluated post scan.
-      if (schema.findType(id) instanceof Type.NestedType) {
+      // evaluated post scan. Variant types also need to be evaluated post 
scan to access
+      // shredded statistics.

Review Comment:
   +1 on this.



##########
data/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/data/TestMetricsRowGroupFilter.java:
##########
@@ -988,6 +993,97 @@ public void testTransformFilter() {
         .isTrue();
   }
 
+  @TestTemplate
+  public void testVariantFilterNotNull() throws IOException {
+    assumeThat(format).isEqualTo(FileFormat.PARQUET);
+
+    Schema variantSchema =
+        new Schema(
+            required(1, "id", IntegerType.get()),
+            optional(2, "variant_field", Types.VariantType.get()));
+
+    File parquetFile = new File(tempDir, "test-variant" + System.nanoTime());
+
+    OutputFile outFile = Files.localOutput(parquetFile);
+    try (FileAppender<GenericRecord> appender =
+        Parquet.write(outFile)
+            .schema(variantSchema)
+            .createWriterFunc(GenericParquetWriter::create)
+            .build()) {
+
+      for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+        GenericRecord record = GenericRecord.create(variantSchema);
+        record.setField("id", i);
+
+        if (i % 2 == 0) {
+          VariantMetadata metadata = Variants.metadata("field");
+          ShreddedObject obj = Variants.object(metadata);
+          obj.put("field", Variants.of("value" + i));
+          Variant variant = Variant.of(metadata, obj);
+          record.setField("variant_field", variant);
+        }
+
+        appender.add(record);
+      }
+    }

Review Comment:
   +1. Seems we don't need to write to the files.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to