Guosmilesmile commented on PR #14127: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14127#issuecomment-3317101321
@pvary Thanks for the quick replay. > Would it make sense to separate the read path to a different PR for faster reviews Yes, I have split this pr into two different pr. But the second part relay on the first one, so the ci in second part will fail. However, I don't think this should affect the review. > For V3 tables, should we enforce this behavior? From my perspective, if the v3 table does not enforce this behavior, the lineage information will be lost, and users will not be aware of it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
