ZENOTME commented on issue #1797: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1797#issuecomment-3459660590
> One strong strong suspicion is looking at the project [commits](https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/commits/main/) is that it might help to get some more capacity for reviews / docs / whatever (it appears that @liurenjie1024 is doing the bulk of reviews recently, and @Xuanwo has been helping too) There is indeed a need for more review capacity. The lack of review resources has slowed down progress on some issues. In this situation, forking might be a faster way to see results. > Thanks for bringing this up! I’m looking forward to hearing more feedback from our users about what they want. I strongly agree that a split community can be a big loss to all of us, so I really want to avoid forking becoming the final decision. If there are anythings I can do, please let know. > > > What would help you the most maintaining / moving this crate forward? How can we help? > > The most limited resource for us is review. If experienced developers can help review PRs, it would be really helpful! +1. There is a need for more review capacity. The lack of review resources has slowed down progress on some feature request. In this situation, forking might be a faster way to see results. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
