XJDKC commented on PR #13225: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13225#issuecomment-3498980190
> I wonder if #14465 could affect safety of encrypted tables, and if yes, how this can be handled.. IIUC, the encryption key must be accessible to the query engine in order for it to decrypt and encrypt the data. Could you please help me understand why allowing a custom builder would raise security concerns? From my perspective, even without that PR, users could still copy the code and replace the default TableOperations implementation. The PR just simply introduces a generic interface to make such customization cleaner and more maintainable. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
