rdblue commented on a change in pull request #1759:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/1759#discussion_r522437430



##########
File path: 
spark3-extensions/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/extensions/TestManageSnapshotsProcedures.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.iceberg.spark.extensions;
+
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import org.apache.iceberg.AssertHelpers;
+import org.apache.iceberg.Snapshot;
+import org.apache.iceberg.Table;
+import org.apache.iceberg.catalog.Namespace;
+import org.apache.iceberg.exceptions.ValidationException;
+import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
+import org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException;
+import org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset;
+import org.apache.spark.sql.Row;
+import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.NoSuchProcedureException;
+import org.junit.After;
+import org.junit.Test;
+
+public class TestManageSnapshotsProcedures extends SparkExtensionsTestBase {
+
+  public TestManageSnapshotsProcedures(String catalogName, String 
implementation, Map<String, String> config) {
+    super(catalogName, implementation, config);
+  }
+
+  @After
+  public void removeTables() {
+    sql("DROP TABLE IF EXISTS %s", tableName);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testRollbackToSnapshotUsingPositionalArgs() {
+    sql("CREATE TABLE %s (id bigint NOT NULL, data string) USING iceberg", 
tableName);
+    sql("INSERT INTO TABLE %s VALUES (1, 'a')", tableName);
+
+    Table table = validationCatalog.loadTable(tableIdent);
+    Snapshot firstSnapshot = table.currentSnapshot();
+
+    sql("INSERT INTO TABLE %s VALUES (1, 'a')", tableName);
+
+    assertEquals("Should have expected rows",
+        ImmutableList.of(row(1L, "a"), row(1L, "a")),
+        sql("SELECT * FROM %s ORDER BY id", tableName));
+
+    table.refresh();
+
+    Snapshot secondSnapshot = table.currentSnapshot();
+
+    List<Object[]> output = sql(
+        "CALL %s.system.rollback_to_snapshot('%s', '%s', %dL)",
+        catalogName, tableIdent.namespace(), tableIdent.name(), 
firstSnapshot.snapshotId());
+
+    assertEquals("Procedure output must match",
+        ImmutableList.of(row(secondSnapshot.snapshotId(), 
firstSnapshot.snapshotId())),
+        output);
+
+    assertEquals("Rollback must be successful",
+        ImmutableList.of(row(1L, "a")),
+        sql("SELECT * FROM %s ORDER BY id", tableName));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testRollbackToSnapshotUsingNamedArgs() {
+    sql("CREATE TABLE %s (id bigint NOT NULL, data string) USING iceberg", 
tableName);
+    sql("INSERT INTO TABLE %s VALUES (1, 'a')", tableName);
+
+    Table table = validationCatalog.loadTable(tableIdent);
+    Snapshot firstSnapshot = table.currentSnapshot();
+
+    sql("INSERT INTO TABLE %s VALUES (1, 'a')", tableName);
+
+    assertEquals("Should have expected rows",
+        ImmutableList.of(row(1L, "a"), row(1L, "a")),
+        sql("SELECT * FROM %s ORDER BY id", tableName));
+
+    table.refresh();
+
+    Snapshot secondSnapshot = table.currentSnapshot();
+
+    List<Object[]> output = sql(
+        "CALL %s.system.rollback_to_snapshot(snapshot_id => %dL, namespace => 
'%s', table => '%s')",

Review comment:
       Is `%dL` required or could it be `%d`? I think because of the casting 
that was added, it could be `%d`.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to