jayceslesar opened a new issue, #2938: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/2938
I was reading the [Monotonic Row Timestamp Proposal](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cXr_RwEO6o66S8vR7k3NM8-bJ9tH2rkh4vSdMXNC8J8/) and it calls out how PyIceberg and states the following: > Currently, [Java](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/035e0fb39d2a949f6343552ade0a7d6c2967e0db/core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/TableMetadata.java#L369-L377) and [Rust](https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/blob/b05a675db44645becc60422b596f16cca8816a89/crates/iceberg/src/spec/table_metadata_builder.rs#L384-L397) implementations try to prevent significant backward clock drifts over one minute, while [Python](https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/main/pyiceberg/table/update/__init__.py#L424-L468) implementation allows snapshots with any timestamp values. We should probably align with that implementation -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
